Legal Opinion

Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 26, 2000No. 99-5039Published

1Opinion of the Court

210 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2000)

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, as successor to MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION and MARTIN MARIETTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and affiliated corporations, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

99-5039

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DECIDED: April 26, 2000

Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims

Judge Diane Gilbert WeinsteinDonald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Thomas W. Winland. Of counsel on the brief was Daniel J. King,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Winstar Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Burlington Northern Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API