Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Commission
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
RICHARDSON, C.J.
I respectfully dissent.
The majority would reverse the trial court’s de novo computation of appellant’s losses at $5250, and uphold the original valuation of $18,200, as determined by the First Commission. The majority bases its decision on two conclusions of law:(1) In the absence of express statutory authority, the Second Commission was without authority to re-certify losses as determined by the First Commission; and(2) The State is equitably estopped from contesting and overturning the findings of the First Commission. The Circuit Court was without…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People Ex Rel. Chase v. . WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.