Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yamada v. Natural Disaster Claims Commission

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1973No. 5223Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

RICHARDSON, C.J.

I respectfully dissent.

The majority would reverse the trial court’s de novo computation of appellant’s losses at $5250, and uphold the original valuation of $18,200, as determined by the First Commission. The majority bases its decision on two conclusions of law:(1) In the absence of express statutory authority, the Second Commission was without authority to re-certify losses as determined by the First Commission; and(2) The State is equitably estopped from contesting and overturning the findings of the First Commission. The Circuit Court was without…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Handlon v. Town of BellevilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. GoldsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. People Ex Rel. Finnegan v. . McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. People Ex Rel. Chase v. . WempleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API