Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bailey v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 3, 1996No. S96A0379Published

1ConcurrenceCarley, Justice

I agree with the majority that under the present statutory scheme, a party seeking appellate review of an order granting or refusing temporary alimony must comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). However, I do not agree with the implication of the majority opinion that an order awarding or denying temporary alimony has always been subject to the interlocutory appeal provisions of what is now OCGA § 5-6-34 and that the resolution of the issue before us is simply a matter of applying Scruggs v. Ga. DHR, 261 Ga. 587 (408 SE2d 103) (1991) and Rebich v. Miles, 264 Ga.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rebich v. MilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Scruggs v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  3. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. Ritchea v. RitcheaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API