Legal Opinion

Drinkard v. Jenkins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 8918. [fn*]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County ; Bruce Young, Judge. Action by J. H. Drinkard against J. J. Jenkins and wife. Judgment for plaintiff. From a judgment on a new trial for plaintiff for only part of the relief asked, and setting aside a sale under the original judgment, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, O. J.

J. H. Drinkard instituted this suit on October 15, 1915, against J. J. Jenkins and Essie E. Jenkins to recover on two certain promissory notes' — one for the sum of $511.20, executed by J. F. Eastus, payable to the order of J. J. Jenkins, in installments. This note was given as part of the purchase money of lot 7, block 79, of the Glen wood addition to the city of Ft. Worth, and secured by a vendor’s lien. It was alleged that said note had been indorsed by J. J. Jenkins, and made payable to the order of one A. (M. Hudson, who thereafter, before maturity, indorsed and transferred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Overton v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Harn v. PhelpsTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Eddleman v. McGlatheryTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Kruegel v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Sheffield v. Johnson County Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Meadows & Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Rutledge v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Hiller v. Prosper Tex, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Dansby v. StroudCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Bray v. First Nat. Bank of MertzonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API