In Re Petition of Wilhelm
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
On December 24, 1930, a petition purported to be signed by six electors, alleging a number of violations of the Corrupt Practice Act, approved the 5th of March, 1906, P. L. 78 (25 PS. Sec. 1015), in the expense account of George Franklin Brumm, candidate for Congress, was presented to the court of quarter sessions of Schuylkill County, praying that it be certified “so that the court may audit the same.” The court ordered the petition filed, and on January 5,1931, directed the clerk “to certify the account referred to in the foregoing petition to the court for audit. ”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mercersburg Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Bechtel's Election ExpensesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lerten AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Lauterbach v. LauterbachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Yachere v. YacherePennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1971
- In re Laub's AccountNorthampton County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1938
- Lerten AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951