Legal Opinion

Karreman v. Karreman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Grove, J. Bill by Cora Karreman against Adrian R. Karreman for a divorce. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

A bill for divorce was filed by complainant in this cause, charging extreme cruelty on the part of the defendant. The testimony was taken in open court, and decree rendered by the circuit judge in accordance with the prayer of the bill. The questions involved are purely questions of fact, the discussion of which would not profit any one. The trial court saw the witnesses. The decree is justified by the evidence, under the rulings of this court in the following cases: Warner v. Warner, 54 Mich. 492; Hoyt v. Hoyt, 56 Mich. 50; Whitmore v. Whitmore, 49 Mich. 417; Briggs v. Briggs, 20 Mich. 34;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Warner v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Nicholas v. NicholasMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Whitmore v. WhitmoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartka v. HartkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Donaldson v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Vollrath v. VollrathMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Butgereit v. ButgereitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Brusseau v. BrusseauMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API