Legal Opinion
DOCS v. Kinsella
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1996PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Crew III, J.
In mid-1990, petitioner Department of Correctional Services (hereinafter DOCS) developed a program known as HUB, under the provisions of which correctional facilities in close geographic proximity to one another would be clustered under a single controlling administration. According to one of the architects of HUB, the program was designed to, inter alia, increase efficiency and improve the over-all management of the programs provided by those facilities. Later that year, DOCS also formulated a deficit reduction plan, which ultimately was to result in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Kurzyna v. Communicar, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Kornblum v. Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Board of Education v. Public Employment Relations Board of StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Public Employees Federation v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by15 opinions
- Romaine v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- De Vito v. KinsellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Benson v. CuevasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Sliker v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- King v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.