In re the Motor Carrier Applications of Janco, Inc.

The trial court in Finding of Fact 18 adopted and incorporated the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) assigned to hearing the matter by the PUC. These findings specifically state that Janeo had carried its burden in showing public convenience and necessity for serving entities owned by Janeo shareholders and their related companies. The trial court did not address this portion of the ALJ decision. The decision of the PUC did not differentiate between granting the permits for service to the general public and granting permits for service to these other entities. I would therefore…