Fort v. State

1. In the absence of a timely written request, the mere fact that opinion evidence wa3 introduced does not require an instruction as to the weight of such evidence.

2. Where, in charging on the prisoner’s statement, the court instructs the jury that they may believe it in preference to the sworn testimony, but omits to give in charge a part of the language of the statute, and counsel for the accused fails to call the court’s attention to the omission until after verdict, the error, if any, will be held to have been waived. Wheeless v. State, 92 Ga. 19 (2) (18 S. E. 303).

3. In the tidal of a…