Blake v. Bolte
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal from city court, general term. Action by Israel 0. Blake against Herman Bolte. From an order -of the city court (30 N. Y. Supp. 209) affirming an order in supplementary proceedings directing defendant to pay the judgment out of his salary, and in default thereof that a precept of commitment issue, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.
On the 31st March, 1894, in a supplementary proceeding in the city court, an order was served upon the appellant, citing him to attend and make discovery concerning his property, and enjoining him from mailing meanwhile any transfer or disposition of his property. The appellant is a justice of a district court in this city, and as such is entitled to a salary of $6,000 a year, payable in •equal installments on the last day of each month. Upon his examination it was disclosed that on the 31st of March or on the 2d of April he received $500, the installment of salary for the month of March) and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bliss v. . LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Moffat v. . HermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Bangs v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Fischer v. . RaabNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bowery National Bank v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re CondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Consumer Credit Corp. v. LewisNassau County District Court · 1970
- Bridgman v. American Book Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Dyer v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Blake v. BolteNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895