Legal Opinion

Judy Copeland v. Housing Authority of Hollywood

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 25, 2008No. 08-10744UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Judy Copeland, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the Housing Authority of Hollywood and one of its employees, Tim Schwartz, on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. Copeland alleged that the Housing Authority violated the Due Process Clause and deprived her of constitutionally protected property rights when it terminated her housing benefits. The court granted summary judgment against her based on res judicata. Copeland contends that res judicata does not bar her claims because they were not addressed in earlier, related state court actions. She also challenges the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Dept. of Transp. v. JulianoSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  3. Ragsdale v. Rubbermaid, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Rhonda Kizzire v. Baptist Health SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Sea Quest Intern. v. Trident ShipworksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Copeland v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Copeland v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  3. Judy Copeland v. Housing Authority of HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API