Legal Opinion

Sellars v. Redondo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated March 20, 1998, as denied his cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Sellars v. RedondoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rubina v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Wiwigac v. SnedakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Weintraub v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Trane Co. v. 401 Broad Hollow Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API