State v. Hart
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber
Defendant Hart appeals from conviction in the Fourth Judicial District Court, Lake County, upon a jury verdict of guilty of sexual assault. We affirm the District Court.
Defendant maintains that the District Court erred in admitting police testimony of several statements allegedly made by defendant prior to his receiving a Miranda warning. See Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. The State and defendant disagree on whether defendant was in custody when he made the statements and whether defendant’s motion to suppress the statements was timely.
In the early…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. AustadMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GottaMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GreywaterMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GreywaterMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. VonBergenMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. GriffingMontana Supreme Court · 1998