Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 2009No. A07-653Published

1Dissent

DISSENT

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent, because the Commission has failed to explain why it has departed from prior norms and has not set forth a “reasoned analysis” for the departure and its actions with regard to the matter before us are therefore arbitrary and capricious. See Sierra Club v. Clark, 755 F.2d 608, 619 (8th Cir.1985) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Preliminarily, but fundamentally, it is important to note that the language governing the authority of the Commission to grant a variance is mandatory rather than permissive. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sierra Club and Defenders of Wildlife v. William P. Clark, as Secretary of the Interior and the Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas UtilitiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API