Legal Opinion

Matter of Property Seized From Chiodo

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 23, 1996No. 95-851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

The issue before us is whether an automobile belonging to claimant Thomas Chiodo was properly forfeited under Iowa Code chapter 809 (1995). The district court denied Chiodo’s application for the return of the automobile and entered an order forfeiting the automobile to the State. We affirm.

I. Background facts and proceedings. On March 8,1995, drug enforcement officers of the Des Moines police department exeeut-. ed a search warrant at the residence of claimant Chiodo. An officer advised Chiodo and his friend, Angela Boord, of their Miranda rights, and the two…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. FinnelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. United States v. Susan D. Bieri Leonard Bieri, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In The Matter Of Property Seized From Bo (Brian) Li, Na Tian, And Wei TianSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. In Re Property Seized From TerrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. State v. $10,000 Seized From Mary PatrickCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
  4. In Re Property Seized From WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2002
  5. In the Matter of Property Seized for Forfeiture from Barbara J. KavarsCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API