Legal Opinion
Coraci v. Yurkin
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1957Published
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
One defendant moves for an order permitting it to serve an amended answer and include a cross complaint therein. Plaintiff objects to the proposed amendment, while the codefendant objects to so much of the motion as prays for leave to serve the cross complaint. Each form of relief requested and the objection thereto will be discussed separately. The action is brought to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the claimed negligence of the defendants. In paragraph (14) of plaintiff’s complaint it was alleged in substance that at the time of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Mark v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Thompson v. . Postal Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Levy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Drescher v. MirkusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.