Holmes v. Spencer
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1DissentHoward, Circuit Judge
Because our decision to remand rests wholly on a claim for equitable relief that is not properly before us, I respectfully dissent.
“There are few principles more securely settled in this court than the principle which holds that, absent exceptional circumstances, an appellant cannot raise an argument for the first time in a reply brief.” N. Am. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Lapalme, 258 F.3d 35, 45 (1st Cir.2001). We have long held, “with a regularity bordering on the monotonous,” that such arguments are deemed waived, and with good reason: an appellee cannot conscionably be expected to respond, in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Michael Lacava v. Kenneth D. Kyler the District Attorney for Philadelphia County the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-AliceaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.