Sailer v. Mercer County
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurrence
ChristiaNSON, Ch. J.
(concurring specially). I concur in the principles stated in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 of the syllabus and in those portions of the opinion prepared by Judge Burke relating to and covered by such paragraphs of the syllabus. But I have doubt as to the correctness of the rule announced in paragraph 9 of the syllabus and am not prepared to concur therein or in that portion of the opinion relating to and covered by said paragraph 9 of the syllabus. The general rule stated in paragraph 9 of the syllabus is one of importance and its effect such that “I think it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ruddy v. RossiSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Leavitt v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Emmons County v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Fish v. FranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- McKenzie v. BoyntonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.