Legal Opinion

Freidus v. Todem Homes, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division so far as appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in that court’s memorandum decision. We add only that the Appellate Division did not exceed its powers when its order stated that “it is determined that Todem Homes, Inc., has the right to specific performance of the option agreement dated June 10, 1969”. Although not an order granting specific performance in the earlier action, we take this “determination” as a necessary predicate to deciding the question of ownership of the property in dispute.

*529Chie…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Freidus v. EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Gardner v. JaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Ferguson v. FergusonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API