Legal Opinion

Trail v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 22, 1909No. 4049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the County Court on a forfeited bail bond. Appellant insists that no forfeiture of bond could be taken, because the capias upon which the principal was arrested failed to charge any offense against the law, and that an arrest could not be had without a capias, and as the capias was void, therefore the whole proceeding, as well as the taking of the bond, was void. It is not necessary or material, in a proceeding to forfeit a bail bond, to show the defendant was arrested. See article 443, Code of Criminal Procedure. In the case of Lindley v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Counts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. State Military Note Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API