Legal Opinion

Levy v. Hohweisner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Julius Levy, from. a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York in favor off the defendants, entered on the' 28tli day of July, 1904, awarding them possession and costs in a replevin suit.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

We think that in the absence of the plea"authorized by section 117 of the Municipal Court Act,* and of any proof that the defendants had required a return, of the chattel, the final judgment in this action cannot award possession of the chattel to the defendants. *83(Mun. Ct. Act, § 123.) The judgment, however, may be- modified on this appeal. (Mun. Ct. Act, § 310; Christiansen v. Mendham, 45 App. Div. 554; Fitzhugh v. Wiman, 9 N. Y. 559.)

The defendants under their answer of. title in a third'person Were entitled to offer evidence of the title of Walker, and consequently, to call…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fitzhugh v. . WimanNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Brady v. BeadlestonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Christiansen v. MendhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Shepherd v. MoodheNew York City Court · 1894

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Beck v. SchneiderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
  3. Dunn v. FieldAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
  4. Railroad Waterproofing Corp. v. Memphis Supply, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API