Legal Opinion
Dahlberg v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 30, 1943No. 8285, 8286PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The appellants filed petitions in the District Court to enforce awards of the National Railroad Adjustment Board which gave each seniority rights in accordance with his claim. That Court, after hearing, held that the Board’s interpretation of the contract which governed their rights was erroneous, and these appeals are from the Court’s order dismissing the complaints.
We may say at once that we are of the opinion that the Court was clearly right in holding that Rule 6(a) of the contract, which provides that yardmasters will be placed upon the seniority registry “as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Washington Terminal Co. v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. United States Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bower v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Edwards v. Capital Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Kirby v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.