Legal Opinion

The Mermaid

District Court, D. Washington

Decided October 19, 1900Published

In Admiralty. Buit by seaman to recover wages.'

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

The libelant’s demand for wages is resisted on the ground that, having shipped for a voyage from Port Blakely to Cape Nome, in the district of Alaska, he deserted from the vessel before she had reached her destination at Cape Nome, in violation of his shipping contract to serve as a common sailor on a voyage to Cape Nome and return to a port to be selected by the master. A seaman’s contract for service on a particular voyage or for a definite period of time is not valid unless he signs shipping articles as prescribed by section 4511, Rev. St. U. S. See Diochet v. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The OccidentalDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1900
  2. Diochet v. The OccidentalDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1898
  3. The C. F SargentDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API