Legal Opinion
Stolz v. Travelers Commercial Ins. Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 28, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01923Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD ROYCE STOLZ, II, No. 2:18-cv-1923-KJM-KJN 12 Plaintiff, FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANT’S 13 v. SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE 14 TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL (ECF Nos. 105, 159, 160) INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 This case arises out of a claim for insurance coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued 18 by Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (“Travelers”). The house is located in El Dorado 19 Hills, California, and plaintiff Edward Royce Stolz, II (“Stolz”) holds some…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.