Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taxpayers & Citizens of Shelby County v. Acker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1994No. 1930713, 1930760Published

1DissentShores, Justice

I dissent. The sole issue before us is whether the warrants that were validated by the Circuit Court of Shelby County constitute a debt or indebtedness of Shelby County within the debt limit imposed upon counties by § 224, as amended by Amendment 342, of the Alabama Constitution of 1901. Although the warrants are entitled “limited obligation refunding warrants” and will be issued to refund or retire the debts on existing warrants before the maturity date of those warrants, our case law indicates that the limited obligation warrants are considered an indebtedness of the County pursuant to §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. LuskSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  2. Hagan v. Commissioner's CourtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. In Re Opinions of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Taxpayers of Shelby County v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Taxpayers and Citizens v. Town of GeorgianaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API