Legal Opinion
Kulm Credit Union v. Harter
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1968No. Civ. 8392PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTeigen, Chief Justice
(On reassignment) .
This appeal involves a controversy between two defendants in a foreclosure action prosecuted by the plaintiff mortgagee who held the senior lien on the land. The controversy relates to the surplus funds after foreclosure sale.
The plaintiff, Kulm Credit Union, which is not involved in this appeal, commenced an action to foreclose a real estate mortgage upon land, which mortgage was given by the defendant Duane Harter, also not involved in the appeal. Goebel Bros. Inc., hereinafter called the appellant, and Lisbon Implement Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arnold Schildhaus v. Kenneth W. Moe, as District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Gila River Ranch, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Sioux Falls Construction Co. v. Dakota FlooringNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Rocky Mountain Tool & Machine Co. v. Tecon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martinson v. First National Bank of Oakes (In Re Martinson)District Court, D. North Dakota · 1983
- Fargo Biltmore Motor Hotel Corp. v. Metropolitan Federal Bank (In Re Fargo Biltmore Motor Hotel Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1985
- Moen v. MoenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Rohrich v. RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund v. University DevelopersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.