Legal Opinion

McKnight v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 22, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bell County. Tried below before Hon. John M. Furman.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

Appellant’s seventeenth assignment of error is, in part, well taken. Some of the evidence of some of the witnesses named in this assignment seeks to establish and prove the declarations of William Reed after the execution of the deeds under which the plaintiffs claim. It was proper to permit the witnesses to testify as to what was said and done by William Reed, prior to and at the time of executing the deeds to his three granddaughters, Florence, Ida and Bettie, children of W. C. Reed by his first wife, but what was said and done by him subsequent to the execution of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beville v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wallace v. Berry, AdmintstratorTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. James v. TankersleyTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Griffin v. Stadler's AdministratorsTexas Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. BondTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Eckert v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Earl v. MundyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Schmidt v. BaarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Hambleton v. DignowityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API