Adoption of Olivette
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Among the claims of error raised by the parents in their appeals from decrees terminating their parental rights is the claim that the trial judge erred in admitting hearsay testimony concerning the child’s allegations of sexual abuse pursuant to G. L. c. 233, § 82. We conclude that the judge did not abuse his discretion in concluding that the testimony satisfied the requirements of § 82; discerning no merit in the parents’ other claims of error, we affirm the decrees.
Background. Olivette was born on May 8, 1999. She was placed in foster care in February, 2001, when she was nineteen months…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re the Department of Public Welfare to Dispense With Consent to AdoptionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Adoption of CarlosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Adoption of QuentinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Adoption of FrederickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adoption of DaisyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- In re Adoption (AndMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- JOHN NUNES v. SARAH DUFFY & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- A.P. v. M.T.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- In re Adoption OsmaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.