Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. Hall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 24, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Judge.

Appellee, Harold Hall, is totally disabled by reason of a herniated disc. The consensus of opinion among the medical witnesses who examined him and are familiar with the case history is that the disability can be minimized by surgery and that the prospects of a successful result justify the operation. All agree that this type of surgery would be termed a "major operation” 1 but that the danger to life and limb from its proper and competent performance is relatively negligible. Appellee has declined to submit to it, and the only question here is whether his refusal is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Black Star Coal Co. v. SurgenerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. United States Coal & Coke Co. v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  3. United Electric Coal Company v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
  4. Robertson & Harper Construction Co v. IsaacCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rivera Rivera v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. SalleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967
  3. Arthur G. McKee & Company v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  5. Beth-Elkhorn Corp. v. EplingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API