Legal Opinion

In re Swedick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 9, 2012Published

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1998. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Albany County.

By decision dated February 3, 2011, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year (Matter of Swedick, 81 AD3d 1033 [2011]). He now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

Our examination of the papers submitted on the application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re SwedickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API