Legal Opinion
O'Keefe v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarpinello, J.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Public Health Law § 230-c [5]) to review a determination of the Hearing Committee of respondent which revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine in New York.
A Hearing Committee of respondent sustained six specifications of professional misconduct against petitioner, an internist, which included gross negligence, gross incompetence, negligence on more than one occasion and incompetence on more than one occasion (see, Education Law § 6530 [3]-[6]). The spec*695ifications relate to petitioner’s care of nine patients…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Featherstone v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Adler v. Bureau of Professional Medical ConductAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lawrence v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bottros v. DeBuonoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maglione v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Genco v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Pearl v. New York State Board for Professional Medical ConductAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Gant v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ticzon v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003