Legal Opinion

United Petroleum Corp. v. Atlantic Refining Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 21, 1965No. File No. CV 12-6502-5429Published

1Opinion of the CourtMonchun, J.

This action, asking for damages as well as an injunction and a decree restraining the defendants from completing or continuing to maintain a sign alleged to have been erected on the defendants’ land maliciously and with intent to annoy and injure the plaintiffs in the use and enjoyment of their land, falls within the provisions of §§ 52-480 and 52-570 of the General Statutes. Sec*256tion 52-480 provides for the granting of an injunction, while § 52-570 provides a legal remedy in damages for the same type of malicious erection. Our laws have provided a remedy against this type of malicious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitlock v. UhleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  2. Seymour v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  3. Canfield Rubber Co. v. LearySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Parker-Quaker Corporation v. YoungConnecticut Superior Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API