Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Clark

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1929No. 27785PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrteeiti-t, J.

On the 6th day of August, 1926, appellant executed a policy of fire insurance known as a Mississippi farm policy, by which it undertook to insure the appellees on a certain dwelling house located twenty-eight miles west of the town of Lucedale. The policy was for a period of five years, and was for the face amount of one thousand dollars, although in the clause naming the insured there was the following recital: “Does insure J. A. Allman and A. J. Clark as interest may appear.” Tlie policy recites the usual terms found in farm fire insurance policies, and of these the following’ are made…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Mut. Ins. Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. GibsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1894
  4. New York Life Insurance v. O'DomMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Germania Life Insurance v. BouldinMississippi Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mississippi Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. ToddMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. National Life and Acc. Ins. Co. v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Employers Fire Insurance v. SpeedMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. ThornhillMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Sands v. Bankers' Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API