Legal Opinion
Fanning v. Conley
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1965No. Civ. No. 9212PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, District Judge.*
This is an action to recover income taxes for the year 1958 in the sum of $5,882.95 plus interest thereon of $690.-08, making a total of $6,573.03, which plaintiff paid pursuant to a deficiency assessment which she claims was erroneously made by defendant. The taxes were assessed upon money paid to plaintiff by Leo Burnett Company, Inc. (“Burnett”) the employer of her late husband, Charles O. Husting, subsequent to his death. The payments were made in 1957, 1958 and January 1959. Only those made in 1958 are involved in this action.1
Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Eva L. Gaugler, on Behalf of Herself and as Under the Last Will and Testament of Raymond C. Gaugler, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Hazel B. Kasynski, Formerly Hazel B. AinsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Genevieve E. Frankel, of the Estate of Samuel F. Frankel, Deceased, and Genevieve E. FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Estate of Olsen v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1965
- Paschkes v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1969