Aymar v. Sligh

BY THE COURT.

This is an action for damages resulting from personal injuries received by Sligh when he was struck by an automobile driven and operated by Aymar. In the trial court Aymar admitted his liability and this admission eliminated all question's except the amount of damages Sligh should recover.

It is claimed here that the trial court erred when, under such conditions and situation, it permitted counsel for Sligh, on cross examination, to interrogate Aymar in respect to the distance he drove his machine before stopping after the collision. Prom this examination it appeared that Aymar’s…