Kesler v. AMSCO Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BODY, District Judge.
And now, this twenty-fifth day of January, 1968, it appears that:
1. This Court entered an order dated December 28,1967 as follows:
It is ordered that if motions heretofore referred to are to be argued before this Court, then each party is to pay one-half of the cost of the transcript of the testimony; and further, the Court grants leave to the parties to order the transcript within ten (10) days as provided under Local Rule 31.
*5242. The plaintiff, through his counsel, ordered the transcript of the record by letter dated January 2, 1968 to the Court Reporter, Lewis H.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Shaw v. LauritzenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Smith v. Sharples Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968