Legal Opinion

M-Z-M-R

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2012No. ID 3769PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

26 I&N Dec. 28

(BIA 2012) Interim Decision #3769 Matter of M-Z-M-R-, Respondent Decided October 4, 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In assessing an asylum applicant’s ability to internally relocate, an Immigration Judge must determine whether the applicant could avoid future persecution by relocating to another part of the applicant’s country of nationality and whether, under all the circumstances, it would be reasonable to expect the applicant to do so. (2) For an applicant to be able to internally relocate safely,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
  2. MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
  3. Bernard Lukwago A/K/A Melvin Haft v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Arout Melkonian v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Singh v. IlchertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Narinder Singh v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. A-R-C-GBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
  3. Garcia-Cruz v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  4. Shaker Ullah v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  5. Maria Juan Antonio v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API