Legal Opinion

James A. Williams v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 1956No. 14882_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

The appellant undertakes to present here by one brief appeals from orders denying motions to set aside and vacate several sentences imposed upon him in the District Court of the Territory of Alaska. The motions were made under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. Three of the sentences were imposed by the court sitting in the Fourth Division at Fairbanks, Alaska, and one was imposed by the court in the Third Division sitting at Anchorage, Alaska. In each case he was charged with the crime of larceny by check. The three cases in the Fourth Division were there numbered 1841, 1842 and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Sinclair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. United States v. BradfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Crow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Manuel Lee Matysek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  3. Joseph Orby Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. William Ernest Hoffman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. James A. Williams v. Pierce County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API