Legal Opinion
Blauweis v. Kirschner
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 4, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This is an appeal by the tenant from the final order and judgment in favor of the landlord. The proceeding was instituted to recover possession of premises used for dwelling purposes in the borough of Brooklyn, N. Y., on the ground that the tenant was a holdover and was objectionable. His rent was nineteen dollars per month for five rooms and bath. Upon the trial the court stated that the landlord was only required to prove that the tenant was holding over, and that the necessity for proving objectionability no longer existed in view of the provisions of chapter 842 of the Laws of 1926. By…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Durham Realty Corp. v. La FetraNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Woollcott v. . ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Woods v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Powers v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- People Ex Rel. Ross v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gould v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1934