Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Goodwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1931No. Appeals, 23 and 38Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

In these two appeals, the facts show, with slight variation, situations similar to those in Commonwealth v. Banholzer, filed herewith, excepting that in the present cases no stipulations to abate the piggery nuisances within sixty days were filed by defendants. Counsel on both sides state in their briefs that the questions involved, aside from that regarding the stipulation, are the same as those raised in the Banholzer Case, and adopt their arguments in briefs filed in that cause. The facts on the record of the two present cases show illegal and offensive…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lutz v. Department of HealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. BanholzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API