Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank in Dallas v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 11, 1940No. 12879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

This suit was for commission alleged to, be due and owing, following the completion of a real estate transaction. Appellant bank has appealed from a judgment rendered against it, of $2,125, upon jury answers, (1) That Oliver Smith was the procuring cause of the sale and exchange between defendant First National Bank in Dallas and R. Lacy, evidenced by a contract of date February' 1, 1938; (2) that prior to said date (February 1, 1938), Smith did not abandon his efforts to induce R. Lacy to purchase the land in question from said bank, and (3), that R. (or Roger) Lacy would have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hodde v. Malone Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Masters v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Goodman v. HenckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Haley v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Stone v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maine v. GarvinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Valley Film Service v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API