Legal Opinion

State v. Keen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 11, 1980No. 79-421PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

This is an appeal taken by the State from the trial court’s order granting the appel-lee’s motion to suppress evidence. Appellant contends that the seizure of evidence was based upon probable cause and was therefore valid. We agree, and reverse.

On November 30, 1978, Detective Fraw-ley of the Martin County Sheriff’s Office observed appellee at the front desk of the Sheriff’s Office in the company of Glen Harden and Charles Roous. Later that same day he again observed appellee, this time inside the Martin County Jail, though neither appellee nor Harden had signed the log required…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. OuttenSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  4. State v. KnappDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Skelton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Wille v. RaymondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Simon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. TavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. SHARRON TASHA FORD v. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API