Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Eide v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1988No. 79392, (Calendar No. 7)Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGriffin, J.

We granted leave to appeal in this case to decide whether the Civil Rights Act1 provides the spouse of a person subjected to discrimination with a remedy for loss of consortium, and to decide whether that act allows recovery of exemplary damages.2 We would answer both questions in the negative.

i

Plaintiff Valerie Eide was employed as an inspector in the Milford, Michigan, plant of the defendant, Kelsey-Hayes Company, from January, 1972, until April 10, 1980, when she walked out of the plant. Thereafter, she and her husband, Craig Eide, filed this employment discrimination suit, alleging that…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API