Jenks v. Jenks
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This case is now before us on remand from the Supreme Court. We previously considered it in Jenks v. Jenks, 34 Conn. App. 462, 642 A.2d 31 (1994), in which we concluded, inter alia, that the trial court had abused its discretion in opening the stipulated marriage dissolution decree on the ground of duress. The Supreme Court, after granting certification, concluded that the evidence supported opening the judgment and reversed our decision and remanded the case to this court “for consideration of any preserved issue or issues not yet resolved.” Jenks v. Jenks, 232 Conn. 750, 756, 657 A.2d 1107…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Marcil v. MarcilConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Blaydes v. BlaydesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Jenks v. JenksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Jenks v. JenksConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Billings v. Billings, No. Fa85 022 44 26 S (Dec. 15, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Brookfield Zon. Comm. v. Fairfield Res., No. Cv 94 0315616 (Oct. 10, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Grich v. Grich, No. Fa93-525311 (Oct. 27, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Heywood Heights Assn. v. City of Stamford, No. Cv84 0073616 (Dec. 22, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998