Legal Opinion

Berry v. Krittenbrink

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1922Published

Appeal from Adair District Court. — J. H. Applegate, Judge. Action in equity to partition with supplemental petition to quiet title and determine the validity of certain liens on the lands in controversy. Defendants Malone and Zellmer appeal.-—

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

1- ”eSonEpendmg partition action. This is an action in partition and originally was entitled C. B. Berry, plaintiff vs. George F. Krittenbrink, et ux., defendants. Plaintiff in the original suit claimed to be the owner of an undivided one-half interest in the 100 acres of land in controversy, title to which wag jn name of defendant Krittenbrink. The trial court found the equities of the cause to be with plaintiff and appointed S. Lincoln Butt as referee to make partition. On appeal to this court the decree was affirmed. Berry v. Kritenbrink, 185 Iowa 1121.

*1325Upon the affirmance a supplemental…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Freeman v. . AuldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Gans v. . ThiemeNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Fuller & Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Kent v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Foy v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API