Mason v. Le Clair Mines Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
These parties occupy the same relative position here as in the trial court and for convenience we refer to them as plaintiffs and defendants respectively. Darwin T. Mason, attorney for plaintiffs, is the- party of that name, and is referred to as Mason.. This cause is now before us on Mason’s request, in a letter to the clerk of this court, that the writ of error be enforced as a mandate, and defendants’ motion to dismiss the writ for plaintiffs’ failure to tender bill of exceptions within the time limited.
The motion to dismiss must be granted. Ordinarily this would be done without written…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- LaPlant v. AxelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Schmidt v. WitherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Shull v. ShullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914