Legal Opinion

Windstead v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 3, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2004-0887Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES WINSTEAD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civ. A. No. 04-887 (JMF) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case was referred to me for all purposes including trial. Currently pending before me is Plaintiffs [sic] (George Morgan, Juanita Irving, James Winstead, Louis Beale, Patricia Newby, Sheila Owens and Mary Waley) Motion for Motion for [sic] Reconsideration of the January 26, 2009 Order (“Plains. Mot.”) [#81]. For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be granted. As noted in previous opinions,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Mary Ann Kelly v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API