Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartford Casualty Insurance v. Pennington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1999No. Appeal No. 1Published

1Dissent

Green, J. P.

(dissenting). I respectfully dissent. Supreme Court properly determined that defendant James Pennington’s criminal conviction does not collaterally block the civil litigation of the issues whether decedent’s death was “expected or intended” by the insured (see, Allstate Ins. Co. v Zuk, 78 NY2d 41, 43-44) or was the result of a covered “occurrence” (see, Allegany Co-op Ins. Co. v Kohorst, 254 AD2d 744; General Acc. Ins. Co. v Zazynski, 229 AD2d 920, 921). Contrary to the majority’s position, Pennington’s conviction of intentional murder does not establish that decedent’s injuries…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RegisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. GallagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Allstate Insurance v. ZukNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Allegany Co-op Insurance v. KohorstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. In re the Liquidation of Nassau InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API