Legal Opinion

Cole v. Beyland

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1901Published

Action by George W. Cole against Louis Beyland. Plaintiff demurred to defendant’s answer. Demurrer sustained.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The action is for debauching the plaintiff’s wife and alienating her affections. The defendant, after denying the allegations of the complaint, pleads, “as a separate and further defense, * * * that long prior to the times mentioned in * * " the complaint the plaintiff herein, by Ms unmanly, unkind, abusive, scandalous, niggardly, penurious, vindictive, and offensive treatment of the said Anna M. Cole [plaintiff’s wife], alienated and destroyed any respect, regard, esteem, love, or affection wMch the said Anna M. Cole ever had, or might have had, for the plaintiff herein, and thereby deprived…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. . HalbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Hadley v. HeywoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Bennett v. Matthews & WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Bunnell v. GreatheadNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Coleman v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API