JEFFREY D. JENDRO, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

Jeffrey D. Jendro (“Movant”) is attempting to appeal from a “Judgment and Order” that “overruled and denied” his claim that he had been abandoned by post-conviction relief (“PCR”) counsel. See Rule 29.15. 1 Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in finding that he was not abandoned by his second of three PCR attorneys and “in overruling Movant’s motion for [PCR] without making a single finding of fact or conclusion of law regarding any claim in Movant’s Rule 29.15 motion[.]”

Because the motion court’s “FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT” (“abandonment judgment”) did not…